Skip to main content
The Law Offices of Ricky Malik, P.C.

BIA on Sentence “actually imposed”: suspended execution of sentence vs imposition of sentence suspended

All too often any criminal sentence imposed is considered the actual punishment in the Immigration context.  The Board of Immigration Appeals addressed this issue 15 years ago in Matter of Esposito, 21 I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 1995).

“For purposes of section 212(a)(10) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(10) (1988), and its successor provision at section 212(a)(2)(B) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(B) (Supp. V 1993), a sentence is “actually imposed” where a criminal court suspends the execution of a sentence, but no sentence is “actually imposed” where the imposition of sentence is suspended. Matter of Castro, 19 I&N Dec. 692 (1988), followed.”

Focused on Clear Solutions Our firm is committed to simplifying your immigration process

Mr. Malik has always been a tireless advocate for the rights of immigrants in the United States, and has aggressively and relentlessly advocated on behalf of countless businesses and individuals.

Talk with Ricky


Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.